PREFACE ON BELIEF AND CONSPIRACY:

I BELIEVE that the floor and ground won’t suddenly become quicksand and that the water from my faucet won’t immediately kill me. However, I don’t automatically believe that anything I read or hear is an accurate reporting of an “objective” event. Indeed, NO TEXT CAN BE FULLY TRUE, as their interpretations always depend on contexts never included within the texts.

I KNOW, from my analysis of many texts, that many “conspiracies” have been “confirmed to have occurred”, and that many other claimed conspiracies are highly probable of having occurred. However, I don’t BELIEVE that any proposed conspiracies, I may research, must have occurred or be occurring. I BELIEVE that these texts are “real claims”(which I observe) might be valid, but they need not be associated with “real events”.

The possible conspiracy I report here, I would not bet on being real. However, there is something weird going on (within The Trump Phenomenon), and what I speculate might be happening – and if it is – immediate steps should be taken. At least prove that the meeting on June 9, 2016 actually did occur.

¶ 4 Leave a comment on paragraph 4 0  

Might the June 9, 2016
meeting with Trump Jr.
and the daily increasing participant membership
be a False Flag:
a meeting that NEVER OCCURRED?

¶ 5 Leave a comment on paragraph 5 0  

Might this be a trap set for the “liberal – left” media – justifying the Trump/GOP claim that Russia-Gate is TOTALLY deceptive fake news by opponents of MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN – a play to the Trump Base?

Might some of the players soon reveal their plot to trap the Democrat/Clinton Conspiracy, when some of the “claimed meeting participants” give evidence to Senate Committees next week. Kushner at the Intelligence Committee on Monday (24th) and Don Jr. & Manifort at the Judiciary Committee on Wednesday (26th).

****************

¶ 9 Leave a comment on paragraph 9 0  

¶ 10 Leave a comment on paragraph 10 0 On first glance, this appears as crazy and impossible as claims the USA never landed on our Moon. But, the “nature” of “truth” vs “fake” is in turmoil, and many of the “games” being played are unique to this moment – both hard to believe they are happening and are being tolerated. We can’t claim with much confidence that many, radically new types of activities may not happen, and also be tolerated as a nu social/societal “reality” begins manifesting (such as have occurred many times in human history).

A new model of reality I have been developing, distinguishes between material systems and humankind (which exists, in a way, only via information) and makes such a hypothesized happening possible. It also may have primed me to think of this option.

¶ 12 Leave a comment on paragraph 12 0 If I am correct, then time is very short to call them on their game; if even there is anything that can now be done to minimize the damage.

¶ 13 Leave a comment on paragraph 13 0 The plot would work for them only if the meeting NEVER took place at The Trump Towers on June 9. Is it possible to demonstrate that the MATERIAL EVENT (the actual meeting on June 9) took place, or didn’t take place? Were their physical bodies at or around the claimed site of the meeting on the claimed date? Language/symbolic reports claiming presence, such as hotel room registration, will not suffice, as they could be fabricated.

¶ 14 Leave a comment on paragraph 14 0 Some of the tweets, and other media reports and documents, will be valid “texts” or observable semiotic structures (sems) with valid sources. Other sems might have been “faked”, as to ascribed source.

¶ 15 Leave a comment on paragraph 15 0  

¶ 16 Leave a comment on paragraph 16 0 For example:

* Are  there independently authenticated photos taken during the meeting?

** Are there independently authenticated photos taken of the claimed participants at the Trump Towers or vicinity on June 9?

*** Are there independently authenticated records of meeting participants being/arriving in NYC on June 9 (or earlier)?

**** Are there independently authenticated persons working at the Trump Towers who can provide evidence that the meeting occurred, or never occurred, as reported?

¶ 21 Leave a comment on paragraph 21 0 The plotters may have made mistakes, in their eagerness to expand the meeting membership one person at a time. This, to me, smells of over-confidence. The plotters may have become excited about how well it was going – the MSM and anti-Trump politicians and pundits having taken the bait – hook, line, and sinker.

¶ 22 Leave a comment on paragraph 22 0 They may plan to use this gullibility to further establish their claim of Fake News produced by the anti-Trump (Deep State) movement. However, hard evidence they may have planted to substantiate the primary meeting attendees (those non-Trump associates – such as the Russian lawyer – already in the USA) may not exist for the latest, newly revealed, meeting attendees.

¶ 23 Leave a comment on paragraph 23 0 Anti-Trump activists must immediately “assemble detective teams” to research the actual meeting. A meeting might well have occurred in the room at the date and time, but not including critical (non Trump associates).

¶ 24 Leave a comment on paragraph 24 0 Can the three Trump associates (at the claimed meeting) get away with public exposure of the facts that they had explicitly fabricated the meeting for the MSM?  I doubt they will have any problem with their true believers, who blindly support anything they do. CNN & MSNBC will react in defense. The 3 Trump Associates may claim this was a legitimate strategy to demonstrate how devious the MSM is in wanting to believe the worst about Trump+. It will bring into question everything that has ever been reported in opposition to Trump+. There will be many persons, not fully supporting Trump+, who become cautious about all future critical reporting about Trump+.

¶ 25 Leave a comment on paragraph 25 0  

¶ 26 Leave a comment on paragraph 26 0 The critical revelation of today
(not yet acknowledged by most) is that
ALL NEWS IS FAKE.
Every report is necessarily
OUT OF CONTEXT,
and “fake”
(that it is open to many alternative interpretations).

¶ 27 Leave a comment on paragraph 27 0 “Facts”, as in the material sciences,
don’t exist in the human sciences.

¶ 28 Leave a comment on paragraph 28 0  

¶ 29 Leave a comment on paragraph 29 0 So-called “fact checking” by the major MSM, quite extensive in this era of fake news, may have missed this because they weren’t looking for it.

¶ 30 Leave a comment on paragraph 30 0 This may also be coordinated with a push to move RussiaGate (as a plot by the Deep State) to public attention and solidify their claim of both
(1) NO collusion with Russian  and (2) that WHAT WAS DONE should be legit – in these NEW Trumpian Times. Such “logical contradictions” may not have “purchase power” in the new “ideological realities” emerging.

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

¶ 31 Leave a comment on paragraph 31 0 What is happening in the USA may well NOT BE a (troublesome, but legitimate) variant of an imperfect “republic/democracy”; but a very explicit and dedicated COUP against the American “Constitutional” form of governance. There need not be a single, unified “conspiracy” to validate this claim.

¶ 32 Leave a comment on paragraph 32 0 We have no useful info whether the visible Trump+ is (1) a freak happening or (2) a deep conspiracy. Are there powerful global forces behind Trump+, with clear objectives to destroy (what is being labeled The Deep State), where Trump+ is but a tool, later to be abandoned?

¶ 33 Leave a comment on paragraph 33 0 Are we witnessing a shift between formal vs informal (systems vs networks) dominance in global econ-politics? Has the informal/networked organizational-pattern of mafias (organized “crime” in earlier decades) migrated from “street” crimes to governmental & financial “crimes”? Are the new “oligarchs” the new “mafia bosses”, at the next level in the holarchy? Might “nation states” and “corporations” no longer be the only societal players, ON TOP?

¶ 34 Leave a comment on paragraph 34 0 Don’t assume that because a “process” is “global”, that it has unique accesses to SUPER powers. Organized MASSES can also be SUPER powerful. But, I don’t recommend the use of manipulated MASSES – unless absolutely necessary. Organizing MASSES can disrupt a process, but can’t, by themselves, generate a viable and humane NU PROCESS. Our future viable actions must to BEYOND revolutionary, beyond our contemporary imagination.

¶ 35 Leave a comment on paragraph 35 0 Our first action must to initiate processes to seaf us BEYOND BEYOND – to transcend our transcendable limitations.