1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 Brief metaphors about the magnitude of paradigm shifts we need:

2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 The “vehicle” you are driving through life is having difficulty.
It will be critical whether you treat it analogous to a
CAR   or   HORSE.

3 Leave a comment on paragraph 3 0 ************

4 Leave a comment on paragraph 4 0 What is “humankind”?
Are we using the appropriate “categories”?

5 Leave a comment on paragraph 5 0 What if “humankind”
doesn’t always function according to
the Laws of Logic & Physics?

6 Leave a comment on paragraph 6 0 What if everything everyone experiences
is part of Humankind.

7 Leave a comment on paragraph 7 0 “Objective Realities”
are conceptual, constructed/woven contexts
“created/emergent as maps”,
but always experienced within Humankind.

8 Leave a comment on paragraph 8 0 What the term, in our language, “Humankind” labels,
cannot be “defined” in a few paragraphs,
or even in a few books.

9 Leave a comment on paragraph 9 0 The “entity/meaning” (for “Humankind”) will emerge in our mind/brains
throughout our lives;
different “surfaces” for each,
but with a shared “essence”.

10 Leave a comment on paragraph 10 0 (Surfaces and Essences – Doug Hofstadter

11 Leave a comment on paragraph 11 0 ***********

12 Leave a comment on paragraph 12 0 This is NOT a shift to “consciousness/spiritual” perspectives.
It is a meta shift, transcendent of the duality of the
Material (matter/energy) vs Transcendent (mind/spirit).
Human REASONING will apply to both.

13 Leave a comment on paragraph 13 0 REASONing is a process of dialog,
with self or with others,
seeking REASONs for taking important actions,
within out Lives, within Humankind.

14 Leave a comment on paragraph 14 0 Reasoning doesn’t seek truth,
nor must be logically valid.

15 Leave a comment on paragraph 15 0 My interpretations of:
The Enigma of Reason, by Hugo Sperber   2017

******************

16 Leave a comment on paragraph 16 0 The awesome Magnitude/Scope/Complexity [MSC]
of Humankind’s POTENTIAL,
at this juncture in our evolution/emergence,
is invisible to human experience;
so is not recognized or acknowledged.

17 Leave a comment on paragraph 17 0 Our POTENTIALS are expanding exponentially/fractically,
gaining in utility and viability;
meaningful only in the context of a
SCIENCE” of Humankind ,
not in the
science of material reality.

18 Leave a comment on paragraph 18 0 Our challenges in Material Reality
can only be adequately met
by a nu, uplifted Humanity,
metamorphosed from Humankind by
ACTUALIZING OUR EMERGENT POTENTIALS.

19 Leave a comment on paragraph 19 0 These potentials are evident only as patterns
in our collective semfields, primarily online.

20 Leave a comment on paragraph 20 0 These patterns emerge as Conceptual Schemes
that serve as contexts for our
Pictures / Scenes / Stories / Scenarios,
from
little to BIG.

21 Leave a comment on paragraph 21 0 ********************

22 Leave a comment on paragraph 22 0 Our SEMFIELDS,
our collective, symbolic/semiotic records (sems),
are the essential/critical “environments” for Humankind.

23 Leave a comment on paragraph 23 0 Conversations are temporary semfields, in sound.
Texts are symbolic patterns “printed” on material substrates.
Architectures are “shaped” materials, imposed “form”.

24 Leave a comment on paragraph 24 0 Our SEMFIELDS are as important
as our material ENVIRONMENT.

25 Leave a comment on paragraph 25 0 Today we witness the fragmentation
of our semfields,
as they expand into new media.

26 Leave a comment on paragraph 26 0 This is not a decay from a “ideal”semfield,
a “perfect state” of our myths.
Our semfields are yet embryonic,
in early stages of emergence.

27 Leave a comment on paragraph 27 0 ******************

28 Leave a comment on paragraph 28 0 EVIDENCE
is in the overlap of the
Material World and Humankind’s 7,000+ personal Wrlds.

29 Leave a comment on paragraph 29 0 TRUTH & BELIEF
are features of Humankind Science:
patterns in semfields,
experienced by humans.

30 Leave a comment on paragraph 30 0 Material Reality “exists” independent of humankind;
but, our experiences of Material Reality
are created by ourselves.

31 Leave a comment on paragraph 31 0 *****************

32 Leave a comment on paragraph 32 0 All the above points to a system of Perspective/Paradigm Shifts,
of equivalent importance as the:

33 Leave a comment on paragraph 33 0 GeoCentric to HelioCentric shift,
or the
Classical to Relativistic/Quantum shifts.

34 Leave a comment on paragraph 34 0 Humans + Semfields
is a REALITY
as significant as
The Cosmological Universe
&
Gaia.

35 Leave a comment on paragraph 35 0  

One Responses

  1. NEED: FUNDAMENTAL EPISTEMIC CHANGE – Nuets Nodes  September 25, 2017

    […] Other epistemic shifts are attached to the names: Galileo, Darwin, Einstein, Bohr/Schrödinger/Heisenberg. Today there are hundreds of epistemic shifts in process that can’t readily be attributed to individual persons. Labeled eras, such as The Enlightenment or The Industrial Revolution, are also accompanied by epistemic change. Diffferent cultures have different epistemes. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.